Conducting a Pastoral Search: Questions and Preparation for the Team

In a tweet posted July 29, 2021, Lori K asked for crowdsourcing on resources for pastoral searches. This blog post shares several threads I tweeted in response. I have removed tweet numbers and edited and expanded the threads slightly to improve clarity.

What are some good resources out there that church leadership should read before beginning a pastor search? Helpful info on things to watch out for, red flags to look for, good questions to ask..ect.


Issues Related to Abuse and Trauma-Informed Ministry

Here are some thoughts and questions from my perspective of involvement with church planting and social enterprises and church planter candidate assessor, plus my work as a spiritual abuse survivor-advocate-resource developer.

I appreciate the composite of figuring out “healthy” plus weeding out “toxic.” [See Part 2 for my reasoning for why I start with “unhealthy.”]

I would ask potential pastoral candidates to define “spiritual abuse” and detail their approach to how they would intervene when malignant leaders or congregants are abusing others.

Then, detail their approach for how they would disciple a congregation to prevent abuse in its many forms.

Define “healthy” for Christian individuals and institutions, and detail their approach for developing sustainably healthy ministries and congregational life in the long run.

I’d have the above issues on a preliminary questionnaire, which means a pastoral search/pulpit committee must know their perspective beforehand.

For candidates who make the cut to an in-person interview, I’d suggest a series of follow-up questions on trauma-awareness. The decision-makers need to see viable candidates’ body language plus facial expressions and hear their tone of voice as they respond to these questions—because these questions might shock or surprise a candidate (though they shouldn’t).

Define “clergy sexual misconduct.”

Summarize the laws and legal requirements in our state regarding:

  • clergy and counselor sexual misconduct
  • mandatory reporting of child sexual abuse
  • sex and “consent”

What sources do you use for researching current information on these issues?

I’d have a block of questions to probe interviewees’ experiences with associations and actions that abuse survivors-advocates-bloggers have identified as warning signs. “Tell us your thoughts about …”

  • use of non-disclosure agreements/NDAs
  • church discipline
  • church membership covenants/contracts
  • your “ideal” for leadership structures in the congregation * #MeToo movement and Christian parallels
  • what are boundary lines between legitimate pastoral care and influence, versus “overlording”
  • how leaders must handle allegations of abuse (any form) and what should instigate an independent investigations
  • what should a genuinely “independent investigation” into personal and institutional responsibility for reported abuses look like
  • what constitutes genuinely “biblical” counseling and pastoral care, contrasted with forms that abuse survivors have identified as (re-)traumatizing
  • interpersonal and institutional “reconciliation” that avoids flaws that abuse survivors have noted regarding Christian arbitration, conciliation, mediation

If interviewers/committee members don’t have answers themselves to these issues, are they ready to discern how knowledgeable and equipped candidates are to deal with spiritual toxicity in the congregation?

I may later suggest questions on the more constructive side of building healthy church. But these issues and questions about abuse and toxicity come mostly from the compilation I posted on some history plus core concerns of abuse survivors/advocates over the last 15 years that I’ve been part of it. The constructive side questions come more from church planting/assessing experiences.


Reasons Why I Put Understanding of Abuse/Toxicity Issues Before Plans for Growth/Health

Great list! I’ve thought asking to define (several things) great weeding out tool. Everything here should comprise a required seminary class

I’ve been developing an intermediate introduction that could be used at the college and seminary level. It starts with how to identify and deal with malignant people and toxic systems–then goes into how to build collaborative organizations and partnerships, using systems that are

  • safer
  • suitable for the people involved
  • culturally sensitive
  • match the scale of resources already in the context/neighborhood
  • can survive trends that no one can control (like generational shifts)
  • are holistically sustainable.

For some background on these six elements of stewardship, see section Essentials #9 – Six “S” Indicators of “Success” in Field Guide “Essentials.”

I start with the so-called “negative” for good reason. In working with church planters and social entrepreneurs over the last two decades, my sense is that they’re so focused on getting their start-up off the ground that they are especially vulnerable to it being hijacked by people with toxic agendas. So, if you can’t discern toxicity yet, it is not a great idea to do a start-up, or to attempt transitioning an existing church, ministry, or non-profit.

Similar reasoning goes into my questions aimed at figuring out where pastoral candidates currently are in knowledge, experiences, and wisdom on personal and systemic abuse dynamics. Do those first. If candidates are deficient in understanding about systemic abuse and toxicity, are they adequately prepared to facilitate congregational leadership for “health”? Or would this job situation just become a place for them to experiment with implementing whatever good *theories* they have about how church/organization should ideally run? Getting someone as a congregational facilitator/leader who is merely a theoretician about abuse is a setup for potential (probable?) disaster.

Here’s the overview of that series of Field Guides, the thinking behind it, and probable components. I’m not writing it for a Christian-only context. This forces me to use common-ground language and metaphors that work across communities.


Temperament Indicators are Insufficient for Detect Character-Deficient Candidates

Another Lori, whose tweets are set for limited viewing so I am not linking to her tweet here, commented on the thread with questions for candidates and prep-work for pastoral search team members—which apply to church planter candidate assessments as well. She noted reading @chuckdegroat‘s When Narcissism Comes to Church, and seeing “a need for new systems that start with prevention.”

My response brought up the need for a rigorous psychological evaluation of candidates for pastoral and church planter roles.

Thanks, Lori–many see the need for a new paradigm in church leader/planter assessment. Deep discussions of this came up during launch of @chuckdegroat‘s #WhenNarcissismComesToChurch, including need for psychological evaluation, conducted by a trained professional. A mere Myers-Briggs temperament will not tell you what you need to know about probable narcissism or other character issues that are disqualifications of the candidate from roles of influence and ministry.

The following link goes to a compilation of my study notes on Chuck DeGroat’s excellent book, When Narcissism Comes to Church. That page includes discussion on leader qualification assessment criteria.

Search for “Ridley” and you’ll find links to other posts that discuss or detail Dr. Charles Ridley’s assessment systems for church planter candidates, using experience-/behavior-based evaluation criteria, and more that would be helpful to pastoral search teams. His research work on what constitutes a most probably “successful” planter is based on more of a conventional business model of ministry, where the candidate is more of a vision caster who motivates and influences followers. I would suggest his criteria need to be turned inside out to accommodate the more current embodiment-based model of ministry, where the candidate is more of a vision carrier who role-models and informs/equips those he/she collaborates with. (Eventually, when time/energy allows, I plan on editing and posting an extended essay I wrote 20 years ago on what I see as this necessity for a completely revised paradigm of assessment, based on research using radically different assumptions about what constitutes “success” in ministry leadership.)

Looking for Feedback on Readability of this Article Format

I’d appreciate your feedback on the readability of the format for the article below, my Pyramid of Abuse and Scale of Accountability. I have been plugging away at developing a template to use for PDF print articles from some of my blog posts. I like what I’ve come up with overall, but also know there are some goobers in it and that it would benefit from reader feedback. For instance:

Do you find the format easy to read?

Do the typefaces in the main text feel like they match with one another?

Is there enough spacing between lines, and enough (or too much) white space between sections and around graphics?

Are different levels of subheads easily identified?

Are the colors a help or a distraction?

Those are the kinds of reactions that will help me get my template in better shape.

Once I’ve adjusted the format for better readability, I hope to post a series of printable articles from some of my major blog pieces.

Here is the prototype article. Thanks in advance for taking a look at it and offering your opinions!

Bitter Fruit: Dysfunction and Abuse in the Local Church, by Keith Gordon Ford

Bitter Fruit: Dysfunction and Abuse in the Local Church, by Keith Ford, is set to release in late June of 2021. I wrote the following endorsement quote:

Experiencing a traumatic four-way church split in the 1970s brought on a crisis of faith. Was Christianity false—or was something desperately wrong with that toxic church’s leading, teaching, structuring? There were no books on spiritual abuse recovery until 15 years later. I know now Bitter Fruit by Keith Ford is exactly the kind of solid overview of abuse symptoms, sources, systemic solutions, and health sustainability I needed then, and that the Church needs now! ~ Brad Sargent – author of “futuristguy” blogs and case studies on spiritual abuse.

I recommend Keith’s book as essential reading for abuse survivors, advocates, church leaders, and everyday disciples. Distilled from his extensive ministry experience plus deep reflection on experience of spiritual abuse, Keith Ford provides us a solid theoretical and practical introduction to abuse by individuals and institutions.

He gives a broadband overview of abuse identification, recovery, and prevention issues. I especially appreciate how Keith integrates multidisciplinary insights on symptoms, sources, systemic solutions, and sustainability with the memorable biblical metaphor of abiding in the vine.

Abuse survivor communities have been blessed by a wave of transformative, systems-oriented books the past year. They’ve helped us in our understanding and recovery. Glad to add Bitter Fruit especially to share with our support networks and those ready to understand & stand with us!

A great theological resource and intermediate-level introduction to systemic abuse. Here’s the Amazon Kindle book page, where you can check out a sample, plus review the table of contents and how Keith weaves together key topics and the vine metaphor.

Here’s the Wipf and Stock publisher’s page for Bitter Fruit: Dysfunction and Abuse in the Local Church. Read it, savor it, reflect on what it means to bear sweet fruit instead of bitter … and what to do about toxic/bitter-fruit individuals and institutions.

“Let’s Build a Book!” A Step-by-Step Process that Worked Well for Me

(c) 1995, 2009 Brad Sargent

Someone I follow on Twitter asked, “How do you write a book?” This is a process I’ve added to and adapted over the years for various kinds of non-fiction writing, script projects, case studies, poems, and more. Maybe you’ll find ideas here that will work for your projects.

* * *

Writing a book is overwhelming – if we think about everything all at once. How can we break down the writing process into manageable units that ameliorate our anxieties? (Now, that was a mouthful …)

1. Developing a Working Detail Sheet and “Mission Statement.”

  • Title, subtitle, format, target audience, topics, central idea, take-away value, and unique features. (See the handout on “Focus Questions for Writing Your Book Proposal.”)
  • Write your proposal summary, and mission statement goals in terms of what you’d like your readers to think, feel, and do. Keep material that fits with those goals; set aside material that doesn’t. (But don’t throw it away. It can probably be used elsewhere!)
  • Back-cover copy. Try writing a vivid, two– or three-paragraph overview of your book. Try using a snippet from a dramatic personal story, or a provocative question, as a hook. Don’t worry if it doesn’t come out right at first. You’re working on “tone” here, so this exercise helps set the voice and style when writing your book.

2. Brainstorming.

  • Brain dump. For at least 30 minutes, write out everything you can think of that seems to fit with the book you’re writing. Don’t worry about sorting through the ideas – that will come later. Just “download your brain” onto paper so you capture the essence of important thoughts, anecdotes, quotes, resources, etc.
  • Example: I wrote the outline for one book based on brainstorming and writing a pile of notecards, one idea per card, and then sorting them into clusters of related items. I kept the items that didn’t seem relevant during the sort process, and many of them turned up later as relevant.

3. Clustering Concepts and Adding Ideas.

  • Organize your ideas/notes into relevant clusters of related items.
  • Remove items that don’t fit. (But save them!)
  • Revise your project’s “mission statement” if the brainstorming process helps you see that a change is necessary.
  • Use different kinds of dictionaries (synonyms, antonyms, thesaurus, metaphors, clichés) to add ideas and/or cross-pollinate with what you’ve already written.

4. The All-Important First Chapter.

  • “No one has to read a book, so in chapter one we set the hook.”
  • Publishing house editor Al Janssen suggests that in chapter one we need to: “Grab the reader’s attention immediately. Identify with the reader’s felt needs. Establish your credentials as an author – your right to write to them. Clearly identify the benefits/pay-off of reading the entire book. Let people know where you’re going – give them a promise; then keep it!”

5. Do-able Bits.

  • Break things down into manageable units – book into chapters; chapters into major sections; major sections into subsections; odds and ends (bibliography, indexing, study guide questions, etc.).
  • Example: My mentor in editing, Dr. Lalia Phipps Boone, wrote 26 grade school language arts textbooks in her “spare” time by this method. She broke down the project into a bunch of “do-able bits” that would take either 15 minutes or 30 minutes to complete. Then she listed each bit on a separate piece of paper. (For instance, a 15-minute bit might involve writing a list of 30 to 50 possible vocabulary words for a specific lesson. A 30-minute bit might involve writing three or four paragraphs explaining a grammar rule, giving several examples.) In between classes she taught at the university, she’d pull out a piece of paper and finish that bit.

6. First Drafts.

There’s an excellent tip I learned at a writer’s conference years ago. One speaker said that writing is really about rewriting/editing, and that our first draft is ALWAYS bad, no matter how long it took to pump out. So, why not just write that first draft as fast as possible, because it’ll be just as rough from pouring it out in two hours as if you slave over it and start self-editing immediately and it takes us six hours instead. He called the first draft his “Zero Draft” …

7. Fun and/or Provocative Headlines.

  • In your headlines and subheads, try alliteration, rhyming, humor, allusions to classic or pop culture, questions.
  • Our table of contents is important – headlines act as a roadmap for our readers.

8. Color-Coding to Balance Chapter and Paragraph Content.

  • A helpful process is to color code your manuscripts for different kinds of content components. This will let you see if your material is reasonably well balanced for the type of book you are writing and the kinds of readers you expect. (Different readers need different things in order to identify with you as the writer and keep on reading.) For example, use yellow highlight for personal anecdotes, blue for informational content, green for key points or quotes, orange for practical implications or actions, etc. Then lay out the whole manuscript in order on the floor and step back to get the big picture. If you have more than 2 pages in a row of the same color, you’ve lost some of the readers who need the other kinds of features you offer. For instance, you may need a story section about every other page, and a quote or key point bold-faced every second or third page.
  • If you do this process in MS Word with highlighting colors, you can print it out with the “multiple pages” feature so you get the colors more than the text. Try with 4, 6, or 8 pages printed per single sheet of paper and see what color overwhelms the manuscript. Too much story? Too much theoretical information? See, and adjust …
  • This technique can also help with editing paragraphs, and not just pages. Typically, a paragraph should be mostly one color, maybe two – but if there are multiple colors in the paragraph, and each color is not a block of same-color sentences, then it’s very possible that the types or topics are too mixed up to make sense easily to the reader.

9. Editing.

Writing may be more about re-writing than just getting material down on paper for the first time. Once the editing process gets far enough along, then this tip I learned from my friend Christine Tangvald may prove helpful. Christine writes picture books for children. The word counts per page and in the total book are very stringent for children’s picture books. Once she’s got a good draft done, one of the last stages Christine goes through is to take a highlighter and mark every helping verb in the entire draft: is, was, had, have, been, be, will, may, might, etc. Then she goes through each sentence that has a marked helping verb, and she figures out if that sentence absolutely needs that word in it, or whether the sense can be conveyed by a strong verb without any helping verb. She is usually able to cut a significant number of words from the manuscript that way, plus the remaining text is more direct and uses stronger language. This process isn’t as appropriate for academic, professional, or business writing, where the “indirect voice” is often expected. But it’s worth at least one go-through to remove words that are weak or otherwise just padding, or that are just hedging ourselves from coming across as being too certain.

10. File Organizing – Keep a “Leftovers Drawer.”

Whatever you think you need to “discard” from the current project because it doesn’t fit here means it could fit somewhere else. Keep the leftovers for another project on another day.

Book Review: Posting Peace: Why Social Media Divides Us and What We Can Do About It, by Doug Bursch

I’ve lost track of how many years it’s been since I started following Doug Bursch on Twitter – at least  three, probably more. His threads drew me in because I saw in him an engaging, personable, and consistently positive online presence. I’ve seen Doug interact with consideration, kindness, and good humor toward all, even when confusion and conflict were in the mix. He has given us a trustworthy track record of practicing what he preaches. If that weren’t the case, I wouldn’t be reading or reviewing his book about peacemaking on social media.

Posting Peace: Why Social Media Divides Us and What We Can Do About It is well constructed and vividly written. I see Doug’s heart for pastoral care and spiritual formation in how he conscientiously leads us into the difficult terrain that is social media. He presents us with the core problems, carefully defines relevant terms, and summarizes key communication and media theories. He lays out insightful examples – personal, historical, current, biblical – that illustrate both issues and solutions. I especially appreciated seeing how cross-culturally aware and trauma-informed Doug is, as these are core aspects in productive ministries of reconciliation these days.

Doug’s study questions and practical #PostingPeace exercises with each chapter give us a chance to plum our own motives, face our fears, consider customized ways to embrace and embody the better way of Jesus. Posting Peace also keeps in positive tension the needs and challenges in being kind online and not merely “nice” – yet not avoiding conflict, because that often unlocks the way for people to change.

I came away with a strong sense of both the why-for’s and how-to’s of becoming a constructive ambassador of Christ and His Kingdom in the often divisive minefield of social media. The reading experience gave me a clearer picture and concrete ways for how I can do better online in bridging between polarized camps and creating space for those who are opposed. This is a balanced guidebook, full of wisdom for such a time as this, and I highly recommend it!

Disclosure: I received a digital ARC/Advanced Reader Copy and a print book as part of Doug’s launch team.

Posting Peace is available as of today–April 20th. You’ll find links and resources at the InterVarsity webpage.

The InterVarsity Press publisher’s webpage.

Downloadable excerpt of Chapter 1.

Posting Peace Study Guide PDF. Be sure to download the study guide. It’s really well done, dividing the book into 6 sessions of 2 chapters each. “Talking points” summarize each chapter. There are also notes on the practical experiments/experiences to do on social media, and discussion guides.

Doug Bursch’s @fairlyspiritual Twitter handle and #PostingPeace hashtag.

Forthcoming Review: Posting Peace, by Doug Bursch

I am on Doug Bursch’s launch team for his book, Posting Peace: Why Social Media Divides Us and What We Can Do About It. The release date is Tuesday, April 20th. I will post a full review later, but for now will note that I am finding Doug has an easy-to-read style on tough-to-consider topics about what it means to be peacemakers in a polarizing era. Doug’s writing is clear, insightful, and marbled with humor–just like his tweets on his “Fairly Spiritual” Twitter account.

Pre-order now to get it early on after it releases. You’ll find links and resources at the InterVarsity webpage.

The InterVarsity Press publisher’s webpage.

Downloadable excerpt of Chapter 1.

Posting Peace Study Guide PDF.

Doug Bursch’s @fairlyspiritual Twitter handle and #PostingPeace hashtag.

Easter Weekend and the Role of Music as Solace in the Wake of Trauma

In the darkest days of my dealing with destructive impacts of spiritual abuse, music provided a key source of emotional relief and release, and bittersweet beauty. Extended works have the most appeal and the selections changed with situations.

After my first (and one of the worst) situation of abuse, it was Handel’s Messiah. I listened to it so much that I wore out three sets of cassette tapes–which tells you how long ago that was!

Twenty years later, when I was waking up every night in cold sweats, on the verge of screaming from nightmares about church and the abusive pastor, Les Misérables was the go-to source of solace. Some days I listened to “Bring Him Home” repeatedly, tears soaking into tissues. Friends had given me the CDs a few years earlier and thought I might enjoy it. Little did they know how crucial their gift would be to my sanity …

A few years later, it was the entire Lord of the Rings extended movie trilogy (which I watched at least weekly for years) and its massive soundtrack of 11+ hours of music. Soundtracks provide the emotional cues for one’s journey through the movie, and this one is definitely epic!

I’ve watched the trilogy all in one day a few times, but usually it takes a few days to get through it. So I feel a kinship in real time with Frodo and the Fellowship as they trudge through their journeys.

But that’s what enduring and recovering from spiritual abuse was like–a massive, epic struggle where sometimes all you can do is hang in there and hope that someone left a guidewire for you to grab on to, to get out of that almost endless cave of near despair.

Last night I finished a cycle of listening to The Lord of the Rings Complete Recordings. It took a few days. But it felt like finishing was an appropriate way to mark Good Friday, and now to have Silent Saturday for reflection before Resurrection Sunday.

I’m thankful I’m not in the same place I was when LOTR was my go-to way … to focus what little energy I had in the midst of physical exhaustion from spent spiritual reserves.

These movies and music will long be a deep dive into “the ABCs of resilience and recovery” for me–Arts, Beauty, and Creativity that resource and restore my spirit.


And on this Easter weekend, may you find for the first time or in a renewed way something of beauty that lifts you up …

Forthcoming Review: The Starfish and The Spirit

I have preordered this new book from co-authors Lance Ford, Rob Wegner, and Alan Hirsch and will be reviewing it soon. I believe this will prove to be an important book for helping us shift our thinking about organic and organizational systems — and especially variations on decentralized systems and movements.

I’ve joined the Starfish Learning Stream and have appreciated their webinars on Exponential. Check out info on the book, podcast, and learning community at the book website. Other links:

The Zondervan publisher’s webpage.

The Starfish and The Spirit Facebook page.

Facebook hashtag [ #thestarfishandthespirit ].

The authors overviewed the book content in webinar episode #1. Their guest for episode #2 was the always insightful Linda Bergquist. She was the professor for the cohort of missionaries and church planters I was in for my Theological Field Education in seminary.

Consider preordering this book and becoming part of the online learning community. It will be worth your investment to be more equipped for church and movement that is more holistic, organic, and collaborative!

The book launches March 30th, and there is currently a Launch Week Raffle for The Starfish and the Spirit for several levels of prizes that include signed copies of the book and a one-hour consultation with Lance and Rob via Zoom. The deadline for raffle entries is this Friday. Here is the link to the entry raffle page.

I’m looking forward to reading, reflecting on, and reviewing The Starfish and The Spirit! I’m getting to know Rob and the important ministry work he’s been doing with teams, church planting, networks, and movements. I’ve followed Alan and Lance for over a decade for their missional and leadership work, and reviewed some of their other books:

UnLeader: Reimagining Leadership … and Why We Must, by Lance Ford (Beacon Hill Press of Kansas City, 2012).

5Q Reactivating the Original Intelligence and Capacity of the Body of Christ, by Alan Hirsch (2017; published by 5Q).

Live Aid at 35 — and Me at 65

It’s #LiveAid35 today — memorable for that milestone event, and also as my most important birthday. A friend drove me to my parents’ home so I could go to a diagnostic specialist doctor. I’d gotten progressively more ill over several years, seen 5 different kinds of doctors.

None could figure out what was wrong. Constant fatigue, down to under 130 pounds (not good for being 5’11”), mysterious symptoms. Thankfully, my parents were ready to send me to Mayo Clinic but found a local “House MD” kind of doctor. It took 6 weeks of tests and questionnaires.

I lost track of how many office visits and horrific tests I endured. But the doc came in one time and smiled: “Good news and bad news. The good news is we have a diagnosis. Bad news is, the minute you walk out this door, you’ll probably never be able to get medical insurance.”

He diagnosed the first of what would eventually be five chronic health conditions I’d have. I also had malignant melanoma and clinical depression. This changed the course of my life, after more than a decade of not knowing what was going wrong with my body. In fact, if not for that trip and my diligent parents, I’m certain I wouldn’t be here to celebrate turning 65.

But the whole process began with that trip home, laying on a mattress in the back of my friend’s van, tuning in to bits of the Live Aid broadcast. I’ll eventually write more about both topics — navigating life with multiple chronic health conditions and the Live Aid milestone.

The way I see it, Band Aid/Live Aid events constitute a paradigm shift in philanthropy. People seemed to want to be more directly involved in charitable giving to aid those caught in the 1984 African famine and not leave it all to governments and NGOs. I wrote an overview with thoughts about this significant shift on this page.

This isn’t to say the changes in trajectory were all good, but that we need to acknowledge a culture shift took place. We should try to understand its roots and fruits, and I’m looking forward to doing so in due time. But for today, I’m remembering #LiveAid35 and thankful for still being alive at 65!

Futuristguy Blog Indexing Update

I’ve had an invisible backlog of administrative indexing and archiving work to do on this blog, with the more than 500 articles I’ve posted here. I’ve wanted to get the materials on abuse, recovery, and advocacy reorganized so their content is more clearly described and they are more accessible. So: write descriptions, create a better categorizing system. Not exactly dazzling duties, but work that makes for better navigation for readers to find what they need.

Anyway, in the last few days, I’ve finally gotten all of my most recent Futuristguy blog posts, case studies, and resource websites on systemic abuse indexed, with short descriptions and links to help make searches easier to find topics of interest. I still have some updates to add, with articles I posted from 2015-2017. This all represents nearly 15 years of research writing on related topics. But this is much, much better. For details, check out the expanded table of contents on the “Read This First” page.

For readers who are abuse survivors, advocates, and church/ministry leaders, Index #7 on Abuse Case Studies: Individuals and Institutions, Destructive and (Re)Constructive will likely be of special interest. It brings together all on one page the descriptions plus links to ALL CASE STUDIES I’ve written about, since 2008. There are currently around 50 situations listed (some used as examples in more than one category). They span the range of theological streams, ways of organizing church authority (polity), structural format (centralized or decentralized), and views on gender and parity in ministry. This comprehensive listing includes situations involving individuals and institutions, and whether their actions were destructive/toxic or constructive/healthy. Some of the case studies are presented in contrasting sets of positive/negative impact, some are do-it-yourself learn-and-discern format. When you explore the source documents I link to, you’ll find some of the cases are short, while others are the length of a medium sized book (45,000 to 60,000 words).

I believe this is one of most important resources I’ve compiled. I find that survivors, advocates, and church/ministry leaders regularly ask about specific situations of toxic leaders/systems, or examples of “best practices” in dealing with forms of abuse. This should prove helpful, having so many cases profiled all in one place, categorized and described and linked.

Glad to be this far along in the revamping project, which I’ve been formulating for months. Hopefully, this will up the usability of the *futuristguy* site.

Meanwhile, I’m coming up on my 17th blogaversary. I started April Fool’s Day of 2003. Seemed metaphorically appropriate, so I went with it. Thanks to Andrew Jones and Shannon Hopkins and Jessica Stricker, who were among those who encouraged and/or pestered me to get blogging!